Glucose intolerance in acromegaly is driven by low insulin secretion; results from an intravenous glucose tolerance test.

PURPOSE: Insulin sensitivity (Si) and its role in glucose intolerance of acromegaly has been extensively evaluated. However, data on insulin secretion is limited. We aimed to assess stimulated insulin secretion using an intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT) in active acromegaly. METHODS: We performed an IVGTT in 25 patients with active acromegaly (13 normal glucose tolerance [NGT], 6 impaired glucose tolerance [IGT] and 6 diabetes mellitus [DM]) and 23 controls (8 lean NGT, 8 obese NGT and 7 obese IGT). Serum glucose and insulin were measured at 20 time points along the test to calculate Si and acute insulin response (AIRg). Medical treatment for acromegaly or diabetes was not allowed. RESULTS: In acromegaly, patients with NGT had significantly (p for trend < 0.001) higher AIRg (3383 ± 1082 pmol*min/L) than IGT (1215 ± 1069) and DM (506 ± 600). AIRg was higher in NGT (4764 ± 1180 pmol*min/L) and IGT (3183 ± 3261) controls with obesity than NGT (p = 0.01) or IGT (p = 0.17) acromegaly. Si was not significantly lower in IGT (0.68 [0.37, 0.88] 106*L/pmol*min) and DM (0.60 [0.42, 0.84]) than in NGT (0.81 [0.58, 1.55]) patients with acromegaly. NGT (0.33 [0.30, 0.47] 106*L/pmol*min) and IGT (0.37 [0.21, 0.66]) controls with obesity had lower Si than NGT (p = 0.001) and IGT (p = 0.43) acromegaly. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that low insulin secretion is the main driver behind glucose intolerance in acromegaly. Compared to NGT and IGT controls with obesity, patients with NGT or IGT acromegaly had higher Si. Together, these findings suggest that impaired insulin secretion might be a specific mechanism for glucose intolerance in acromegaly.

KDM1A genotyping and expression in 146 sporadic somatotroph pituitary adenomas.

IMPORTANCE: A paradoxical increase of growth hormone (GH) following oral glucose load has been described in ∼30% of patients with acromegaly and has been related to the ectopic expression of the glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) receptor (GIPR) in somatotropinomas. Recently, we identified germline pathogenic variants and somatic loss of heterozygosity of lysine demethylase 1A (KDM1A) in patients with GIP-dependent primary bilateral macronodular adrenal hyperplasia with Cushing's syndrome. The ectopic expression of GIPR in both adrenal and pituitary lesions suggests a common molecular mechanism. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to analyze KDM1A gene sequence and KDM1A and GIPR expressions in somatotroph pituitary adenomas. SETTINGS: We conducted a cohort study at university hospitals in France and in Italy. We collected pituitary adenoma specimens from acromegalic patients who had undergone pituitary surgery. We performed targeted exome sequencing (gene panel analysis) and array-comparative genomic hybridization on somatic DNA derived from adenomas and performed droplet digital PCR on adenoma samples to quantify KDM1A and GIPR expressions. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-six patients with sporadic acromegaly were studied; 72.6% presented unsuppressed classical GH response, whereas 27.4% displayed a paradoxical rise in GH after oral glucose load. We did not identify any pathogenic variant in the KDM1A gene in the adenomas of these patients. However, we identified a recurrent 1p deletion encompassing the KDM1A locus in 29 adenomas and observed a higher prevalence of paradoxical GH rise (P = .0166), lower KDM1A expression (4.47 ± 2.49 vs 8.56 ± 5.62, P < .0001), and higher GIPR expression (1.09 ± 0.92 vs 0.43 ± 0.51, P = .0012) in adenomas from patients with KDM1A haploinsufficiency compared with those with 2 KDM1A copies. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Unlike in GIP-dependent primary bilateral macronodular adrenal hyperplasia, KDM1A genetic variations are not the cause of GIPR expression in somatotroph pituitary adenomas. Recurrent KDM1A haploinsufficiency, more frequently observed in GIPR-expressing adenomas, could be responsible for decreased KDM1A function resulting in transcriptional derepression on the GIPR locus.

Paradoxical GH increase after oral glucose load in subjects with and without acromegaly.

OBJECTIVE: A paradoxical GH rise after the glucose load (GH-Par) is described in about one-third of acromegalic patients. Here, we evaluated the GH profile in subjects with and without acromegaly aiming to refine the definition of GH-Par. DESIGN: Observational case-control study. METHODS: Our cohort consisted of 60 acromegalic patients, and two groups of subjects presenting suppressed GH (< 0.4 µg/L) and high (non-acro↑IGF-1, n = 116) or normal IGF-1 levels (non-acro, n = 55). The distribution of GH peaks ≥ 120% from baseline, insulin, and glucose levels were evaluated over a 180-min time interval after glucose intake. RESULTS: A similar proportion of subjects in all three groups shows a GH ratio of ≥ 120% starting from 120 min. Re-considering the definition of paradoxical increase of GH within 90 min, we observed that the prevalence of GH peaks ≥ 120% was higher in acromegaly than in non-acro↑IGF-1 and non-acro (respectively 42%, 16%, and 7%, both p < 0.001). In patients without GH-Par, a late GH rebound was observed in the second part of the curve. Higher glucose peak (p = 0.038), slower decline after load, 20% higher glucose exposure (p = 0.015), and a higher prevalence of diabetes (p = 0.003) characterized acromegalic patients with GH-Par (with respect to those without). CONCLUSIONS: GH-Par response may be defined as a 20% increase in the first 90 min after glucose challenge. GH-Par, common in acromegaly and associated with an increased prevalence of glucose metabolism abnormalities, is found also in a subset of non-acromegalic subjects with high IGF-1 levels, suggesting its possible involvement in the early phase of the disease.

Consensus on criteria for acromegaly diagnosis and remission.

PURPOSE: The 14th Acromegaly Consensus Conference was convened to consider biochemical criteria for acromegaly diagnosis and evaluation of therapeutic efficacy. METHODS: Fifty-six acromegaly experts from 16 countries reviewed and discussed current evidence focused on biochemical assays; criteria for diagnosis and the role of imaging, pathology, and clinical assessments; consequences of diagnostic delay; criteria for remission and recommendations for follow up; and the value of assessment and monitoring in defining disease progression, selecting appropriate treatments, and maximizing patient outcomes. RESULTS: In a patient with typical acromegaly features, insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I > 1.3 times the upper limit of normal for age confirms the diagnosis. Random growth hormone (GH) measured after overnight fasting may be useful for informing prognosis, but is not required for diagnosis. For patients with equivocal results, IGF-I measurements using the same validated assay can be repeated, and oral glucose tolerance testing might also be useful. Although biochemical remission is the primary assessment of treatment outcome, biochemical findings should be interpreted within the clinical context of acromegaly. Follow up assessments should consider biochemical evaluation of treatment effectiveness, imaging studies evaluating residual/recurrent adenoma mass, and clinical signs and symptoms of acromegaly, its complications, and comorbidities. Referral to a multidisciplinary pituitary center should be considered for patients with equivocal biochemical, pathology, or imaging findings at diagnosis, and for patients insufficiently responsive to standard treatment approaches. CONCLUSION: Consensus recommendations highlight new understandings of disordered GH and IGF-I in patients with acromegaly and the importance of expert management for this rare disease.

The relationship between morning blood pressure surge and serum IGF-1 level in acromegaly patients with hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: High levels of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) in patients with acromegaly cause structural and functional changes specific to the disease. These changes lead to mortality if the disease is not treated. Circadian blood pressure (BP) rhythm as measured by 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) can change with a decrease in BP during sleep and a sudden increase in wakefulness. AIM: We aim to evaluate the relationship between changes in BP and IGF-1 levels in patients with acromegaly. METHODS: Patients who were diagnosed with acromegaly and the patient group with hypertension were included. Serum biochemistry parameters, serum IGF-1 level and ABPM follow-ups were compared in these patients. RESULTS: In our study, 30 patients with acromegaly and 30 patients with hypertension without acromegaly were included. Thirty of the patients were male and 30 were female. There was a statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of IGF-1(p = < 0.001) and GH(p = 0.004). There was no significant difference between patients' office systolic/diastolic BP measurements, day/night, systolic/diastolic BP measurements and all systolic/diastolic BP measurements in ambulatory blood pressure follow-ups. There was a significant difference in morning blood pressure surge(p = < 0.001). A statistically significant difference was found between the acromegaly patient groups with MBPS below and above 25 mmHg in terms of IGF-1 (p = 0.025) and platelet levels (p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: As a result, cardiovascular disease risks can be predicted in patients with high serum IGF-1 levels by planning ambulatory blood pressure in the early period.

Biomarkers of response to treatment in acromegaly.

INTRODUCTION: Medical treatment of acromegaly is based in a `trial and error` approach. First-generation somatostatin receptor ligands (fg-SRL) are prescribed as first-line medical therapy to the vast majority of patients, despite lack of disease control in approximately 60% of patients. However, other drugs used in acromegaly treatment are available (cabergoline, pasireotide and pegvisomant). AREAS COVERED: In this article, we review and discuss the biomarkers of response to medical treatment in acromegaly. EXPERT OPINION: Biomarkers for fg-SRL that can already be applied in clinical practice are: gender, age, pretreatment GH and IGF-I levels, cytokeratin granulation pattern, and the expression of somatostatin receptor type 2. Using biomarkers of response could guide treatment towards precision medicine with greater efficacy and lower costs.

Predictors of Response to Treatment with First-Generation Somatostatin Receptor Ligands in Patients with Acromegaly.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Predictors of first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands (fgSRLs) response in acromegaly have been studied for over 30 years, but they are still not recommended in clinical guidelines. Is there not enough evidence to support their use? This systematic review aims to describe the current knowledge of the main predictors of fgSRLs response and discuss their current usefulness, as well as future research directions. METHODS: A systematic search was performed in the Scopus and PubMed databases for functional, imaging, and molecular predictive factors. RESULTS: A total of 282 articles were detected, of which 64 were included. Most of them are retrospective studies performed between 1990 and 2023 focused on the predictive response to fgSRLs in acromegaly. The usefulness of the predictive factors is confirmed, with good response identified by the most replicated factors, specifically low GH nadir in the acute octreotide test, T2 MRI hypointensity, high Somatostatin receptor 2 (SSTR2) and E-cadherin expression, and a densely granulated pattern. Even if these biomarkers are interrelated, the association is quite heterogeneous. With classical statistical methods, it is complex to define reliable and generalizable cut-off values worth recommending in clinical guidelines. Machine-learning models involving omics are a promising approach to achieve the highest accuracy values to date. CONCLUSIONS: This survey confirms a sufficiently robust level of evidence to apply knowledge of predictive factors for greater efficiency in the treatment decision process. The irruption of artificial intelligence in this field is providing definitive answers to such long-standing questions that may change clinical guidelines and make personalized medicine a reality.

Revisiting the usefulness of the short acute octreotide test to predict treatment outcomes in acromegaly.

Introduction: We previously described that a short version of the acute octreotide test (sAOT) can predict the response to first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs) in patients with acromegaly. We have prospectively reassessed the sAOT in patients from the ACROFAST study using current ultra-sensitive GH assays. We also studied the correlation of sAOT with tumor expression of E-cadherin and somatostatin receptor 2 (SSTR2) . Methods: A total of 47 patients treated with SRLs for 6 months were evaluated with the sAOT at diagnosis and correlated with SRLs' response. Those patients whose IGF1 decreased to <3SDS from normal value were considered responders and those whose IGF1 was ≥3SDS, were considered non-responders. The 2 hours GH value (GH2h) after s.c. administration of 100 mcg of octreotide was used to define predictive cutoffs. E-cadherin and SSTR2 immunostaining in somatotropinoma tissue were investigated in 24/47 and 18/47 patients, respectively. Results: In all, 30 patients were responders and 17 were non-responders. GH2h was 0.68 (0.25-1.98) ng/mL in responders vs 2.35 (1.59-9.37) ng/mL in non-responders (p<0.001). GH2h = 1.4ng/mL showed the highest ability to identify responders (accuracy of 81%, sensitivity of 73.3%, and specificity of 94.1%). GH2h = 4.3ng/mL was the best cutoff for non-response prediction (accuracy of 74%, sensitivity of 35.3%, and specificity of 96.7%). Patients with E-cadherin-positive tumors showed a lower GH2h than those with E-cadherin-negative tumors [0.9 (0.3-2.1) vs 3.3 (1.5-12.1) ng/mL; p<0.01], and patients with positive E-cadherin presented a higher score of SSTR2 (7.5 ± 4.2 vs 3.3 ± 2.1; p=0.01). Conclusion: The sAOT is a good predictor tool for assessing response to SRLs and correlates with tumor E-cadherin and SSTR2 expression. Thus, it can be useful in clinical practice for therapeutic decision-making in patients with acromegaly.

Incidence and risk factors of cancers in acromegaly: a Chinese single-center retrospective study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the incidence of malignancies in acromegaly and to identify risk factors for newly-diagnostic cancers, especially the excessive growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1). METHODS: A retrospective cohort including 1738 consecutive hospitalized patients with acromegaly in a single referral center between 2012 and 2020 (mean follow-up 4.3 years). A gender- and age-matched case-control study (280 patients from the cohort) was performed for risk factor analysis. RESULTS: One hundred thirteen malignancies (67 diagnosed after acromegaly) were observed. The overall newly-diagnostic cancer risk of acromegaly was higher than the general population (standardized incidence ratio (SIR) 2.81; 95% CI 2.18-3.57). The risk of thyroid cancer (n = 33, SIR 21.42; 95% CI 13.74-30.08) and colorectal cancer (n = 8, SIR 3.17; 95% CI 1.37-6.25) was elevated. In the overall cohort, IGF-1 (ULN: 1.27 vs. 0.94, p = 0.057), GH (1.30 vs. 1.00 ng/ml, p = 0.12), and disease-controlled rate (34.9% vs. 45.9%, p = 0.203) at the last visit did not reach significance between patients with and without post-diagnostic cancer. In the case-control study, GH (1.80 vs. 0.90 ng/ml, p = 0.018) and IGF-1 (ULN: 1.27 vs. 0.91, p = 0.003) at the last visit were higher in patients with post-diagnostic cancers, with a lower disease-controlled rate. Elder age was a risk factor for cancer. Other metabolic comorbidities and the size of pituitary tumors were similar. CONCLUSION: The risk of malignancies, especially thyroid cancer, was increased in patients with acromegaly in our center. More cancer screening should be considered when managing acromegaly, especially in patients with higher posttreatment GH and IGF-1.

Multilineage Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors (PitNETs) Expressing PIT1 and SF1.

PitNETs are usually restricted in their cytodifferentiation to only one of 3 lineages dictated by expression of the pituitary transcription factors (TFs) PIT1, TPIT, or SF1. Tumors that show lineage infidelity and express multiple TFs are rare. We searched the pathology files of 4 institutions for PitNETs with coexpression of PIT1 and SF1. We identified 38 tumors in 21 women and 17 men, average age 53 (range 21-79) years. They represented 1.3 to 2.5% of PitNETs at each center. Acromegaly was the presentation in 26 patients; 2 had central hyperthyroidism associated with growth hormone (GH) excess and one had significantly elevated prolactin (PRL). The remainder had mass lesions with visual deficits, hypopituitarism, and/or headaches. Tumor size ranged from 0.9 to 5 cm; all 7 lesions smaller than 1 cm were associated with acromegaly. Larger lesions frequently invaded the cavernous sinuses. Four cases represented a second attempt at surgical resection. PIT1 was usually diffusely positive but 5 cases had variable (patchy or focal) staining. SF1 reactivity was variable in intensity but diffuse in all but 2 cases. GATA3 data, available in 14 cases, identified diffuse positivity in 5 and focal staining in 1. GH was expressed in all but 5 tumors, PRL and thyrotropin (TSH) were expressed in 14 and 13, respectively, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) in 11 of 18, and luteinizing hormone (LH) in 4 of 17. Keratin staining patterns were diffuse perinuclear/membranous in 27, variable perinuclear in 4, and negative in 3; scattered fibrous bodies were seen in 5 and diffuse fibrous bodies in 1. Ki67 labeling index ranged from < 1 to 7.9%. In 3 cases, these tumors represented one of multiple synchronous PitNETs; a separate corticotroph tumor was seen in 2 patients and one patient had 2 additional discrete lesions, a sparsely granulated lactotroph, and a pure gonadotroph tumor comprising a triple tumor. PitNETs expressing PIT1 and SF1 represent multilineage PitNETs. These rare tumors have variable clinical and morphological features, most often presenting as large tumors with GH excess and occasionally as one of multiple synchronous PitNETs of distinct lineages.

In acromegalic patients the serum levels of interleukin-33 and Resolvin D1 influence skin perfusion of hands: A pilot study.

AIM: Acromegaly is a rare chronic disease, caused by the over-secretion of growth hormone (GH), that creates a pro-inflammatory state, but the exact mechanisms by which GH or insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-I) act on inflammatory cells are not fully understood. Aim of the study was to evaluate Interleukin-33 (IL33) and D-series resolvins 1 (RvD1) and the skin perfusion of hands in patients with acromegaly (AP) and healthy controls (HC). METHODS: IL33 and RvD1 have been assessed in 20 AP and 20 HC. Nailfold videocapillaroscopy (NVC) was performed and skin perfusion of hands was assessed by laser speckle contrast analysis (LASCA) in both populations. RESULTS: IL33 was significantly higher in AP compared to HC [73.08 pg/ml (IQR 47.11-100.80 pg/ml) vs 41.5 4 pg/ml (IQR 20.16-55.49 pg/ml), p < 0.05] and RvD1 was significantly lower in AP than HC [36.1 pg/ml (IQR 27.88-66.21 pg/ml) vs 60.01 pg/ml (IQR 46.88-74.69 pg/ml), p < 0.05]. At LASCA, peripheral blood perfusion (PBP) was significantly lower in AP compared to HC [56.66 pU (IQR 46.29-65.44 pU) vs 87 pU (IQR 80-98 pU), p < 0.001]. The median values of ROI1 and ROI3 were significantly lower in AP compared to HC [112.81 pU (IQR 83.36-121.69 pU) vs 131 pU (IQR 108-135 pU), p < 0.05] and [59.78 pU (IQR 46.84-79.75 pU) vs 85 pU (IQR 78-98 pU), p < 0.05], respectively. The proximal-distal gradient (PDG) was observed in 8 of 20 (40 %) AP. CONCLUSION: Serum IL33 is higher in AP compared to HC; conversely, RvD1 is lower in AP compared to HC. Reduction of PBP of hands was present in AP compared to HC, probably due to endothelial dysfunction.

Whole-Body and Forearm Muscle Protein Metabolism in Patients With Acromegaly Before and After Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Active acromegaly is characterized by increased lean body mass, but the mechanisms underlying the protein anabolic effect are unclear. AIM: To study if active acromegaly induces reversible changes in whole-body and skeletal muscle protein kinetics. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighteen patients with acromegaly were investigated before and 47 ± 10 weeks after disease control by surgery (n = 8) and/or medical treatment (n = 10). Labeled phenylalanine and tyrosine tracers were employed to assess whole-body and regional forearm muscle protein kinetics. Intramyocellular protein signaling was assessed in skeletal muscle biopsies, and whole-body dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scan and indirect calorimetry assessed lean body mass (LBM) and resting energy expenditure, respectively. RESULTS: Disease control induced a 7% decrease in lean body mass (P < .000) and a 14% decrease in LBM-adjusted energy expenditure. Whole-body phenylalanine breakdown decreased after disease control (P = .005) accompanied by a decrease in the degradation of phenylalanine to tyrosine (P = .005) and a decrease in whole-body phenylalanine synthesis (P = .030). Skeletal muscle protein synthesis tended to decrease after disease control (P = .122), whereas the muscle protein breakdown (P = .437) and muscle protein loss were unaltered (P = .371). Unc-51 like autophagy activating kinase 1 phosphorylation, an activator of protein breakdown, increased after disease control (P = .042). CONCLUSIONS: Active acromegaly represents a reversible high flux state in which both whole-body protein breakdown and synthesis are increased, whereas forearm muscle protein kinetics are unaltered. Future studies are needed to decipher the link between protein kinetics and the structure and function of the associated growth hormone-induced increase in lean body mass.

Secondary diabetes mellitus in acromegaly.

Secondary diabetes mellitus (DM) is a common complication of acromegaly, encountered in up to 55% of cases. Vice versa, the prevalence of acromegaly is markedly higher in cohorts of patients with type 2 DM (T2DM). The presence of secondary DM depends primarily on acromegaly status and is associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity, malignancy rate and overall mortality. The principal pathophysiologic mechanism is increased insulin resistance due to excessive lipolysis and altered fat distribution, reflected at the presence of intermuscular fat and attenuated, dysfunctional adipose tissue. Insulin resistance is ascribed to the direct, diabetogenic effects of growth hormone (GH), which prevail over the insulin-sensitizing effects of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), probably due to higher glucometabolic potency of GH, IGF-1 resistance, or both. Inversely, GH and IGF-1 act synergistically in increasing insulin secretion. Hyperinsulinemia in portal vein leads to enhanced responsiveness of liver GH receptors and IGF-1 production, pointing towards a mutually amplifying loop between GH-IGF-1 axis and insulin. Secondary DM occurs upon beta cell exhaustion, principally due to gluco-lipo-toxicity. Somatostatin analogues inhibit insulin secretion; especially pasireotide (PASI) impairs glycaemic profile in up to 75% of cases, establishing a separate pathophysiologic entity, PASI-induced DM. In contrast, pegvisomant and dopamine agonizts improve insulin sensitivity. In turn, metformin, pioglitazone and sodium-glucose transporters 2 inhibitors might be disease-modifying by counteracting hyperinsulinemia or acting pleiotropically. Large, prospective cohort studies are needed to validate the above notions and define optimal DM management in acromegaly.

The science behind the relations among cancer, height, growth patterns, and growth hormone axis.

The association between growth hormone (GH) and carcinogenesis has long been postulated. The rationale for this association is that several components of the GH axis play an important role in the regulation of cell proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, and angiogenesis and have been tested as targets for cancer therapy. Epidemiological and clinical studies have examined the association between height, growth patterns, and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) levels with the most common types of malignancies, while genome-wide association studies have revealed several height-associated genes linked to cancer and/or metastasis-driving pathways. In this context, a permissive role of the GH-IGF signaling system in the link between height and cancer risk has also been investigated. In animal and human models, genetic defects associated with GH deficiency or resistance are associated with protection from tumor development, while the risk of malignancies in acromegaly or in patients exposed to recombinant GH therapy has long been a matter of concern and scrutiny. In this review, we present a narrative and historical review covering the potential relations among height, growth patterns, GH axis, and cancer.

Prospect of acromegaly therapy: molecular mechanism of clinical drugs octreotide and paltusotine.

Somatostatin receptor 2 (SSTR2) is highly expressed in neuroendocrine tumors and represents as a therapeutic target. Several peptide analogs mimicking the endogenous ligand somatostatin are available for clinical use, but poor therapeutic effects occur in a subset of patients, which may be correlated with subtype selectivity or cell surface expression. Here, we clarify the signal bias profiles of the first-generation peptide drug octreotide and a new-generation small molecule paltusotine by evaluating their pharmacological characteristics. We then perform cryo-electron microscopy analysis of SSTR2-Gi complexes to determine how the drugs activate SSTR2 in a selective manner. In this work, we decipher the mechanism of ligand recognition, subtype selectivity and signal bias property of SSTR2 sensing octreotide and paltusotine, which may aid in designing therapeutic drugs with specific pharmacological profiles against neuroendocrine tumors.

Promotion of Joint Degeneration and Chondrocyte Metabolic Dysfunction by Excessive Growth Hormone in Mice.

OBJECTIVE: Many patients with acromegaly, a hormonal disorder with excessive growth hormone (GH) production, report pain in joints. We undertook this study to characterize the joint pathology of mice with overexpression of bovine GH (bGH) or a GH receptor antagonist (GHa) and to investigate the effect of GH on regulation of chondrocyte cellular metabolism. METHODS: Knee joints from mice overexpressing bGH or GHa and wild-type (WT) control mice were examined using histology and micro-computed tomography for osteoarthritic (OA) pathologies. Additionally, cartilage from bGH mice was used for metabolomics analysis. Mouse primary chondrocytes from bGH and WT mice, with or without pegvisomant treatment, were used for quantitative polymerase chain reaction and Seahorse respirometry analyses. RESULTS: Both male and female bGH mice at ~13 months of age had increased knee joint degeneration, which was characterized by loss of cartilage structure, expansion of hypertrophic chondrocytes, synovitis, and subchondral plate thinning. The joint pathologies were also demonstrated by significantly higher Osteoarthritis Research Society International and Mankin scores in bGH mice compared to WT control mice. Metabolomics analysis revealed changes in a wide range of metabolic pathways in bGH mice, including beta-alanine metabolism, tryptophan metabolism, lysine degradation, and ascorbate and aldarate metabolism. Also, bGH chondrocytes up-regulated fatty acid oxidation and increased expression of Col10a. Joints of GHa mice were remarkably protected from developing age-associated joint degeneration, with smooth articular joint surface. CONCLUSION: This study showed that an excessive amount of GH promotes joint degeneration in mice, which was associated with chondrocyte metabolic dysfunction and hypertrophic changes, whereas antagonizing GH action through a GHa protects mice from OA development.

The potential utility of the SAGIT instrument in the clinical assessment of patients with acromegaly, a large single-centre study.

SAGIT is an instrument created for the clinical assessment of acromegaly. Our objective was to test the usefulness of this tool in assessing disease activity of acromegalic patients in a single centre of Poznan, Poland using a retrospective study. Medical records of patients with acromegaly hospitalised at the Department of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Internal Medicine of Poznan University of Medical Sciences in Poland between January 2015 and December 2020 were analysed. SAGIT scores were assessed according to each patient's clinical and biochemical data. The results show that SAGIT scores were higher in treatment-naïve patients and the lowest in controlled patients. There were positive correlations between SAGIT scores and concentrations of calcium, phosphorus, HbA1C levels, and tumour invasiveness at the time of diagnosis. However, parameters such as age, vitamin D concentration, and time from diagnosis showed an inverse relationship with the SAGIT score. In ROC curve analysis, SAGIT scores of 5 or less discriminated controlled patients from uncontrolled (p < 0.0001, sensitivity 76.7%, specificity 78.5%, AUC 0.867). Also, SAGIT higher than 6 indicated for treatment start or escalation (p < 0.0001, sensitivity 80.88%, specificity 77.59%, AUC 0.866). Lack of signs and symptoms (S = 0) could not discriminate between controlled and uncontrolled disease, but predicted therapy maintenance (p < 0.0004, sensitivity 59.5%, specificity 58.2%, AUC 0.604). In conclusion, The SAGIT instrument is easy to use even when completed in the retrospective medical record review. It can be useful for distinguishing clinical stages of acromegaly and in decision-making.

Growth Hormone Signaling in Liver Diseases: Therapeutic Potentials and Controversies.

Growth hormone (GH) and downstream insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) signaling mediate growth and metabolism. GH deficiency causes short stature or dwarfism, and excess GH causes acromegaly. Although the association of GH/IGF1 signaling with liver diseases has been suggested previously, current studies are controversial and the functional roles of GH/IGF1 signaling are still undefined. GH supplementation therapy showed promising therapeutic effects in some patients, such as non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, but inhibition of GH signaling may be beneficial for other liver diseases, such as hepatocellular carcinoma. The functional roles of GH/IGF1 signaling and the effects of agonists/antagonists targeting this signaling may differ depending on the liver injury or animal models. This review summarizes current controversial studies of GH/IGF1 signaling in liver diseases and discusses therapeutic potentials of GH therapy.

Filling the gap between the heart and the body in acromegaly: a case-control study.

OBJECTIVE: Cardiovascul diseases are the most common comorbidities in acromegaly. Potential parameters in pathology of cardiovascular comorbidities are changes in levels of growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) as well as body composition parameters. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to examine morphological and functional parameters of the cardiovascular system by echocardiography and to assess its relationship with disease activity and body composition parameters. METHODS: We prospectively enroled 129 acromegalic patients (82 females, 47 males) and 80 healthy controls (53 females, 27 males) matched for age, gender, and BMI. All patients underwent two-dimensional echocardiography. Body composition parameters were assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. RESULTS: Acromegaly patients presented with higher left ventricle mass (LVM) compared to controls (LVMI: 123 ± 45 g/m2 vs 83 ± 16 g/m2, P < 0.001). Prevalence of left ventricle hypertrophy in acromegaly patients was 67% (78% concentric, 22% eccentric). IGF -1 levels, BMI, and lean mass positively correlated with LVM in all acromegaly patients (P < 0.001). Fat mass positively correlated with LVM in females (R = 0.306, P = 0.005), but this correlation was not found in males. We did not find any difference in size of the left and right ventricle between acromegaly patients and controls. Acromegaly patients presented with left atrium enlargement, diastolic dysfunction and low incidence of systolic dysfunction. Valvopathy was found in 43% of patients with predominant (31%) prevalence of mitral regurgitation. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates higher prevalence of cardiovascular comorbidities in acromegaly patients and the impact of IGF-1 levels and body composition parameters in pathology in some of these comorbidities.

A systematic literature review to evaluate extended dosing intervals in the pharmacological management of acromegaly.

PURPOSE: This systematic literature review investigated whether extended dosing intervals (EDIs) of pharmacological acromegaly treatments reduce patient burden and costs compared with standard dosing, while maintaining effectiveness. METHODS: MEDLINE/Embase/the Cochrane Library (2001-June 2021) and key congresses (2018-2021) were searched and identified systematic literature review bibliographies reviewed. Included publications reported on efficacy/effectiveness, safety and tolerability, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and patient-reported and economic outcomes in longitudinal/cross-sectional studies in adults with acromegaly. Interventions included EDIs of pegvisomant, cabergoline, and somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs): lanreotide autogel/depot (LAN), octreotide long-acting release (OCT), pasireotide long-acting release (PAS), and oral octreotide; no comparator was required. RESULTS: In total, 35 publications reported on 27 studies: 3 pegvisomant monotherapy, 11 pegvisomant combination therapy with SRLs, 9 LAN, and 4 OCT; no studies reported on cabergoline, PAS, or oral octreotide at EDIs. Maintenance of normal insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) was observed in ≥ 70% of patients with LAN (1 study), OCT (1 study), and pegvisomant monotherapy (1 study). Achievement of normal IGF-I was observed in ≥ 70% of patients with LAN (3 studies) and pegvisomant in combination with SRLs (4 studies). Safety profiles were similar across EDI and standard regimens. Patients preferred and were satisfied with EDIs. HRQoL was maintained and cost savings were provided with EDIs versus standard regimens. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical efficacy/effectiveness, safety, and HRQoL outcomes in adults with acromegaly were similar and costs lower with EDIs versus standard regimens. Physicians may consider acromegaly treatment at EDIs, especially for patients with good disease control.